Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 19:15:32 +0000 From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> To: FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: openssl version - how to verify Message-ID: <AANLkTikdpSj3oOhiWi1KYOWZi7fvUeySW99V7_kw4_VY@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20101120123442.2074a054@scorpio> References: <201011192054.oAJKsOPk011590@mail.r-bonomi.com> <AANLkTi=qL4Tp_6%2BObNvCR3V%2BTNjZd-dO%2Bv%2B0740VQLxJ@mail.gmail.com> <20101119163648.19c9e66a@scorpio> <AANLkTinVjNG%2Bf57kxX7HdOep2PSLonqQFFUwh%2BadKEc5@mail.gmail.com> <20101119172200.4e9c8cd5@scorpio> <AANLkTikV-6kS=Fwvpw4qj8dFmq=WnGF2qzPhop35EB_g@mail.gmail.com> <20101120123442.2074a054@scorpio>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 20 November 2010 17:34, Jerry <freebsd.user@seibercom.net> wrote: > On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 16:56:05 +0000 > Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> articulated: > >> >> > > While I agree with your point in this context, the statement >> >> > > "The number of _UNDISCOVERED_ bugs, on the other hand, is an >> >> > > infinite one." is false. >> >> > > >> >> > http://www.unsw.edu.au/news/pad/articles/2009/sep/microkernel_breakthrough.html >> >> People believed Aristotle's assurances about the rate of things >> falling for nearly 2000 years until Galileo and Newton pointed out >> 'obvious' flaws in his method. > > Which is precisely my point in regards to the link shown above. > Er, no. YOU have the burden of proof in your assertion, 'obvious' is not good enough. The link above refers to a study; if you think there's been a bug then show us. Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTikdpSj3oOhiWi1KYOWZi7fvUeySW99V7_kw4_VY>