Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1998 16:37:19 +0200 (CEST) From: Didier Derny <didier@omnix.net> To: David Greenman <dg@root.com> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, support@yard.de Subject: Re: Yard/FreeBSD Problem (fwd) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980817163418.4938A-100000@omnix.net> In-Reply-To: <199808171348.GAA19588@implode.root.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 17 Aug 1998, David Greenman wrote: > For the server, "s" above appears to be the unconnected (listen) socket. > The TCP_NODELAY option is not propagated across to accept()ed sockets, so > you must do the setsockopt on those, not on the listen socket. > > -DG > > David Greenman > Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project > They have made the modification on their program to do the setsockopt on the connect socket but without any success; Is there any possibily to track this socketoption to understand why it diseappear ? When I force the nodelay in the kernel everything works fine -- Didier Derny didier@omnix.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980817163418.4938A-100000>