Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 12:31:42 +0000 From: Nik Clayton <nik@FreeBSD.org> To: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU> Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_sig.c Message-ID: <20041101123140.GB86304@clan.nothing-going-on.org> In-Reply-To: <20041030014408.GA17500@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> References: <200410290824.i9T8Oflr047896@repoman.freebsd.org> <200410291338.50383.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20041029234823.GW24892@elvis.mu.org> <20041030014408.GA17500@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--mvpLiMfbWzRoNl4x Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 09:44:08PM -0400, Ken Smith wrote: > Ok, last try at a compromise. If I commit the fix to todo=20 [...] If J. Random committer fixes something on the ToDo list, and gets re@ approval to merge it back to the appropriate branch, why isn't J. Random committer updating the ToDo list at the same time? Seems to me if you've gone to all the trouble of fixing an item on the ToDo list it's only fair that you get to be the one that gets to remove it from there too. N --=20 FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://www.freebsd.org/ (__) FreeBSD Documentation Project http://www.freebsd.org/docproj/ \\\'',) \/ \= ^ --- 15B8 3FFC DDB4 34B0 AA5F 94B7 93A8 0764 2C37 E375 --- .\._/= _) --mvpLiMfbWzRoNl4x Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBhiysk6gHZCw343URAkfOAKCF9yBCBjVx4zKGAR0tE5DGnUBEhQCdHEf6 H0c/Fvx8svfYB2EKZ80ZK7g= =ywC6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mvpLiMfbWzRoNl4x--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041101123140.GB86304>