Date: Tue, 23 Jan 1996 13:19:26 +0200 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> To: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com> Cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Ownership of files/tcp_wrappers port Message-ID: <199601231119.NAA01191@grumble.grondar.za>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Paul Traina wrote: > They're gone...sorry, I shit-canned eBones/kerberos here in favor of ssh. > You'll have to gen a copy of the patches by hand by using a copy of the pl9 > and pl10 distributions, since ted never posted patches (you might ask him > if he has done so since, tytso@mit.edu). Will do. Ta. > Let's separate the issue here, perhaps we can come to some sort of > compromise. I would have little if any objection to putting optional > calls to libwrap into our existing code in the same fashion we do stuff > with with other optional parts of the system. In other words, if you > wanted to add access control checking to YP or NFSD, and you put in > conditional code that is only invoked if /usr/local/lib/libwrap.a is > present, I won't barf all over my feet. You mean put something like .if (wrappers_lib_exists_in_local) SUPPORT_WRAPPERS = yes .endif in the appropriate Makefiles? > Reasonable compromise? Yup. (And they said the art of negotiation was dead!) M -- Mark Murray 46 Harvey Rd, Claremont, Cape Town 7700, South Africa +27 21 61-3768 GMT+0200 Finger mark@grondar.za for PGP key
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199601231119.NAA01191>