Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 29 Nov 1998 01:51:42 -0800
From:      Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
To:        Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc:        jc@irbs.com, mike@smith.net.au, current@FreeBSD.ORG, smp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Dog Sloooow SMP 
Message-ID:  <199811290951.BAA00828@dingo.cdrom.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 08 Nov 1998 13:43:52 %2B1100." <199811080243.NAA32642@godzilla.zeta.org.au> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >No idea.  I've received verification that fixing this for all 686-class
> >CPUs seems to work (ie. it's OK on the Cyrix MII and doesn't appear to 
> >impact performance there), so the tests are now generalised for the 
> >entire 686-class.
> 
> It's only OK for MII's because of various `#if 0's and `#ifdef SMP's
> that prevent non-OK code from running on MII's.

Care to comment on which operations aren't OK?  I did ask for this in 
the review phase, with no feedback.

-- 
\\  Sometimes you're ahead,       \\  Mike Smith
\\  sometimes you're behind.      \\  mike@smith.net.au
\\  The race is long, and in the  \\  msmith@freebsd.org
\\  end it's only with yourself.  \\  msmith@cdrom.com



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199811290951.BAA00828>