Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 22:34:08 +0700 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@regency.nsu.ru> To: Doug Barton <DougB@freebsd.org> Cc: Alexandr Kovalenko <never@nevermind.kiev.ua>, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/bind CHANGES INSTALL Makefile README Version src/contrib/bind/bin Makefile src/contrib/bind/bin/addr addr.c src/contrib/bind/bin/dig dig.c src/contrib/bind/bin/dnskeygen dnskeygen.c src/contrib/bind/bin/dnsquery ... Message-ID: <20020715223408.E53266@regency.nsu.ru> In-Reply-To: <3D32A42C.18843A31@FreeBSD.org>; from DougB@freebsd.org on Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 03:30:04AM -0700 References: <200207150801.g6F81niF030281@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020715100835.GB14895@nevermind.kiev.ua> <3D32A42C.18843A31@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 03:30:04AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > Alexandr Kovalenko wrote: > > > > Hello, Doug Barton! > > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 01:01:49AM -0700, you wrote: > > > > > dougb 2002/07/15 01:01:49 PDT > > > > > > Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_4_4) > > And how about RELENG_4_3 and RELENG_3 ? > > I definitely will not be doing releng_3, I have no machines to test the > build on, and my personal feeling is that no one should be using > releng_3 anyway. 4.3 came out in april 2001, which is over a year ago. Actually, I've always been under impression that essential security problems should be addressed in every stable branch, that is, RELENG_2_2, and RELENG_3, not to mention RELENG_4*. I've seen recent commit to RELENG_2_2, showing exactly this point AFAIR. ./danfe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020715223408.E53266>