Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 21:30:01 -0700 (PDT) From: David Muir Sharnoff <muir@idiom.com> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/43995: ls -B isn't complete Message-ID: <200210130430.g9D4U1Q6043939@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR bin/43995; it has been noted by GNATS. From: David Muir Sharnoff <muir@idiom.com> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: bin/43995: ls -B isn't complete Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 21:24:03 -0700 I would like to note that Linux's ls has a -b flag that is analogous to FreeBSD ls's -B. The Linux version is not broken. This leads to a query: why are the Linux & FreeBSD ls programs so different? For reference, I was looking at Debian with a 2.4.19 kernel. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200210130430.g9D4U1Q6043939>