Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 01:30:09 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CFT/HEADS-UP: linux 2.6.16 emulation Message-ID: <ep3kup$9dc$1@sea.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <20070122231754.A17361@fledge.watson.org> References: <20070120170723.34c223fb@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <20070122184807.GA26839@home.c0mplx.org> <20070122213039.GA51752@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <20070122231754.A17361@fledge.watson.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] Robert Watson wrote: > This might well be something useful to add though -- an ABI name > exported via kinfo_proc or such. It would also be useful for telling > whether processes are 32-bit or 64-bit native processes, etc. Yes, please. AFAIK currently there are upto 4 ABIs an amd64 machine can have: FreeBSD32, FreeBSD64, Linux32, Linux64 (probably). If it's not now, something like that will be necessary for debugging real soon now. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFtVcXldnAQVacBcgRAoHvAKDSU27fZ4dp/4aGc9BBbFzg2LdkWwCeJw9b BNFbLPMuQQ2y9mThhifCz8w= =WDti -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ep3kup$9dc$1>