Date: Fri, 04 Jun 1999 17:30:02 +0200 From: sthaug@nethelp.no To: marquis@roble.com Cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SSH2 (in FreeBSD-Questions) Message-ID: <96085.928510202@verdi.nethelp.no> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 4 Jun 1999 08:19:08 -0700 (PDT)" References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.990604081850.5931F-100000@roble2.roble.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> One thing ports don't do well is install themselves in predictable > locations. Instead you'll find them installing files in > /usr/local/etc, /usr/local/bin, /usr/local/sbin, /usr/local/libexec, > /var, etc. When I install ssh2 I want it all under /usr/local/ssh. > This alone is a good reason to use ports sparingly (after reviewing the > patches). Having everything under /usr/local/ssh is convenient in many way, but I don't believe there is any kind of agreement that this is *the* only correct way. Myself, I'm happy to have ssh, ssh-keygen etc. under /usr/local/bin (actually /local/bin here) and sshd under /usr/local/sbin. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?96085.928510202>