Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 17:14:58 -0700 From: Dave Hayes <dave@jetcafe.org> To: Lars Engels <lars.engels@0x20.net> Cc: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org>, stable@freebsd.org, Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> Subject: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ? Message-ID: <201206020014.q520EwRU057625@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> In-Reply-To: <20120601194621.GA83046@e-new.0x20.net> References: <CAOgwaMvsv3e1TxDauV038Pp7LRiYeH7oAODE%2Bw-pxHt9oGrXMA@mail.gmail.com> <2730bd1bab4223e718193254cb8bbd60@dizum.com> <CADLo838vpbVP3caXG7LF7st4inWnMLi5zB3U1hD2dkXwf8ZLBg@mail.gmail.com> <20120601194621.GA83046@e-new.0x20.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Lars Engels <lars.engels@0x20.net> writes: > I guess he made his experiences with that some years ago when support > for amd64 in the ports was not very mature. But this has changed since > then, apart from a few ports almost all of them should work on amd64 > without problems. I can vouch for this. I have several production and two development amd64 machines. I've yet to have a problem with a port because of the architecture. -- Dave Hayes - Consultant - Altadena CA, USA - dave@jetcafe.org >>> The opinions expressed above are entirely my own <<< Man does not have a capacity of instant comprehension. So rare is the knowledge of how to train this, that most people and institutions have compromised by playing upon man's proneness to conditioning and indoctrination instead. The end of *that* road is the ant-heap. Or, at best, the beehive.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201206020014.q520EwRU057625>