Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 19:21:02 +0200 From: Peter Holm <peter@holm.cc> To: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thoughts on TMPFS no longer being considered "highly experimental" Message-ID: <20110625172102.GA10311@x2.osted.lan> In-Reply-To: <20110624195716.GZ48734@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <20110623163109.GA508@dragon.NUXI.org> <20110623202153.GS48734@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20110624103016.GA71991@x2.osted.lan> <20110624110627.GW48734@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20110624132105.GA75382@x2.osted.lan> <20110624145043.GY48734@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20110624162003.GA79067@x2.osted.lan> <20110624195716.GZ48734@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:57:16PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 06:20:03PM +0200, Peter Holm wrote: > > Got a "panic: Not a vnode object" quite fast: > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~pho/stress/log/kostik441.txt > > Ah, yes, this is an assertion that was added in the r209702. > http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/tmpfs.7.patch Looks good. The mmap(2) test doesn't panic any more, nor does any of the other TMPFS tests I have. - Peter
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110625172102.GA10311>