Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 19:43:38 +0200 From: Roland Smith <rsmith@xs4all.nl> To: Grant Peel <gpeel@thenetnow.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dump + GZIP Message-ID: <20070816174338.GB97696@slackbox.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <200708160910.14095.lists@jnielsen.net> References: <00b601c7e003$fb1e0200$6501a8c0@GRANT> <200708160910.14095.lists@jnielsen.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--U+BazGySraz5kW0T
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 09:10:12AM -0400, John Nielsen wrote:
> On Thursday 16 August 2007, Grant Peel wrote:
> > Can I safely pump a filesystem dump through gzip during the dumping
> > process?, or di I need to create the dump first then gzip it after?
>=20
> I do it all the time: dump -f - ... | gzip > date_filesystem.dump.gz
> or with bzip2: dump -f - ... | bzip2 > date_filesystem.dump.bz2
Unless you're dumping an unmounted filesystem, add '-L' and '-h 0'. The
first is for dumping a snapshot of a live filesystem, and the second one
is to honor the nodump flag for level 0 dumps.
=20
> > Does zipping the dumps cause any headaches at restore time?
>=20
> Nope: bzcat date_filesystem.dump.bz2 | restore ... -f -
>=20
> > (I currently dump 5 servers worth of data to a raid 5 array, and am abo=
ut
> > 20% away from running out of disk space).
> >
> > Does gzipping a file give a decent compression ratio?
>=20
> Depends on what you're compressing, but generally yes. bzip2 generally=20
> compresses better but takes a lot more time, CPU and memory at compressio=
n=20
> time.
Some time ago I did some tests. Compression with gzip saved 50-60% on
dumps of /, /usr and /var. However, the savings for my /home partition
which contains a lot of digital camera pictures in JPEG format was only
11%.
While bzip2 did 8-10% better (except on /home), it takes a _lot_
longer. So at first I decided to stick with gzip.
Later I decided to skip compression altogether. If the backup medium
becomes corrupted, you might still be able to restore the dump for a
large part. Corruption in a compressed file makes the rest of the file
unreadable.=20
If you don't compress the dumps, it's easy to split them in multiple DVD
sized parts. The size of a dump is given in kiB, and it must be a
multiple of the block size, which defaults to 10 kiB. A DVD is 4.7 GB =3D
(4.7e9/1024//10)*10 =3D 4589840 kiB. The following command creates
a dump of /home in multiple DVD-sized chunks;
dump -0 -B 4589840 -C 8 -P 'cat - >home-vol${DUMP_VOLUME}.dump' -h 0 -L /=
home
You can burn these chunks to DVDs with growisofs, e.g:
growisofs -dvd-compat -Z /dev/dvd=3Dhome-vol0.dump
growisofs -dvd-compat -Z /dev/dvd=3Dhome-vol1.dump
...
In this case you do need temporary storage for the dump files. You could
conveivably modify the argument of -P to burn directly with growisofs.
One caution for backups though. Use only programs that are available on
a install CD or in /rescue. Your restore process should not depend on a
port that you need to install first!
Roland
--=20
R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/
[plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated]
pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725)
--U+BazGySraz5kW0T
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFGxIzKEnfvsMMhpyURAne3AKCVheu1beYhqWcUq8aOVLWOCQBSLACeOHaQ
OwjrAKzhtT/SGhg4DwsWWtg=
=Y11E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--U+BazGySraz5kW0T--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070816174338.GB97696>