Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 00:59:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Tony Fleisher <takhus@takhus.mind.net> To: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [RFC] RELNOTESng for 5-CURRENT Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0104250050530.10183-100000@takhus.dyn.mind.net> In-Reply-To: <200104241603.f3OG3AB06290@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > [...] > > There are two disadvantages to going this route. I think they're > fairly minor: > > 1. Generating a set of release notes requires the DocBook toolchain > to be built, as well as the doc/ subtree. Note that RELNOTESng > will have absolutely no effect on the buildworld/installworld > procedure. > >[...] > > defaulting to off. Once the bugs have been shaken out, I'll make > RELNOTESng the default and stop maintaining the *.TXT files. Eventually, > the *.TXT files will get removed. > Perhaps the *.TXT files could be periodically regenerated to their current location to 1) avoid a POLA violation and 2) allow for at least some RELNOTES without needing DocBook and doc/ (even if they may be slightly out of date). Just an idea.. Tony. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0104250050530.10183-100000>