Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 09:52:37 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org> To: Greg Lewis <glewis@eyesbeyond.com> Cc: Rob Farmer <rfarmer@predatorlabs.net>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, glewis@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/java/jdk16 Makefile Message-ID: <20100609095237.3a463a2a@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <20100609063126.GA96306@misty.eyesbeyond.com> References: <201006082017.o58KHb1o039986@repoman.freebsd.org> <AANLkTik3R8LnuLk9NgrPHWkjntu_ufRaSkkdw5AzG--z@mail.gmail.com> <4C0EB5E8.5040009@p6m7g8.com> <20100609004757.7a61d6f6@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20100609035149.GA94751@misty.eyesbeyond.com> <4C0F146C.3060906@p6m7g8.com> <20100609063126.GA96306@misty.eyesbeyond.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/KcGaw6q1WPFApk4Vs_Jp=0e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 23:31:26 -0700
Greg Lewis <glewis@eyesbeyond.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 12:11:24AM -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> > On 6/8/2010 11:51 PM, Greg Lewis wrote:
> > > The build uses the following logic to detect the presence of
> > > sigignore:
> > >=20
> > > ifeq ($(OS_VENDOR),FreeBSD)
> > > OS_RELDATE :=3D $(shell sysctl kern.osreldate | cut -d' ' -f2)
> > > HAS_SIGIGNORE :=3D $(shell if [ $(OS_RELDATE) -ge 800502 -a
> > > $(OS_RELDATE) -lt 900000 -o $(OS_RELDATE) -ge 900003 ]; then echo
> > > "1"; fi) ifeq ($(HAS_SIGIGNORE),1) override
> > > HAVE_SIGIGNORE =3D true endif
> > > endif
> > >=20
> >=20
> > Why not do something like what devel/apr1 does:
> >=20
> > patch the file to be %%OSVERSION%% here, then in post-patch replace
> > that token with the value. OSVERSION is overloaded correctly on
> > pointyhat and tb(hence QAT) whereas sysctl is not.
> >=20
> >=20
> > post-patch:
> > ${REINPLACE_CMD} -e 's/OSVERSION/${OSVERSION}/g' \
> > ${APR_WRKDIR}/build/apr_hints.m4
>=20
> Thanks. I've committed a change to do this.
>=20
> If someone could please let me know if you see any problems (I don't
> have a box which actually has a recent 8-STABLE or 9-CURRENT I can
> test on) that would be great. It seems to still do the right thing
> on versions without sigignore(3) at least.
Thanks.
> It would also be good to know if QAT is now happy with it.
It's next in the queue, so you'll get a mail about it.
--=20
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
"Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect"
FreeBSD committer -> itetcu@FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B
--Sig_/KcGaw6q1WPFApk4Vs_Jp=0e
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD)
iEYEARECAAYFAkwPOjUACgkQJ7GIuiH/oeVVkQCgiTRGUmRo+fd4tAbh0T/PryIS
x6UAnjf+br1lRr5xYr4SFuJSFd0Fch4N
=sqML
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Sig_/KcGaw6q1WPFApk4Vs_Jp=0e--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100609095237.3a463a2a>