Date: Fri, 6 Dec 1996 23:48:09 -0500 (EST) From: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net> To: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans) Cc: cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-sys@freefall.freebsd.org, dyson@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/include endian.h Message-ID: <199612070448.XAA00309@dyson.iquest.net> In-Reply-To: <199612070430.PAA14687@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at Dec 7, 96 03:30:14 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Most of the kernel doesn't pick up the CPU options. > Why not? That seems to be unwise, shouldn't anything with any cpu specific inlines also pick-up the CPU options? Anything that uses endian.h (or cpufunc.h) are perfect examples of where there might be some value in that. John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199612070448.XAA00309>