Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2) 
Date:      Fri, 6 Dec 1996 23:48:09 -0500 (EST)
From:      "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net>
To:        bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans)
Cc:        cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-sys@freefall.freebsd.org, dyson@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit:  src/sys/i386/include endian.h
Message-ID:  <199612070448.XAA00309@dyson.iquest.net>
In-Reply-To: <199612070430.PAA14687@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at Dec 7, 96 03:30:14 pm
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail 

> 
> Most of the kernel doesn't pick up the CPU options.
> 
Why not?  That seems to be unwise, shouldn't anything with any
cpu specific inlines also pick-up the CPU options?  Anything
that uses endian.h (or cpufunc.h) are perfect examples of where
there might be some value in that.

John
home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199612070448.XAA00309>