Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 31 May 2006 23:35:29 +0300
From:      "Iantcho Vassilev" <ianchov@gmail.com>
To:        "FreeBSD Mailing List" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: kern.ipc.somaxconn should be high for a PF firewall with a lot of states
Message-ID:  <18e02bd30605311335j4f0baaffs62002d4b72c7715b@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <44ac8y1cfk.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
References:  <18e02bd30605290545j1c9cceebwedc8d28bbf270e11@mail.gmail.com> <44ac8y1cfk.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/31/06, Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> wrote:
>
> "Iantcho Vassilev" <ianchov@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > kern.ipc.somaxconn is for handling more incoming connections,right?
>
> Well, kind of.  It's a systemwide limit on the maximum number of
> connections that a given socket can accept.
>
> >                                                                     but
> does
> > firewall connections are considered incoming?
>
> No, not really.  But the question doesn't really make sense.  What are
> you trying to do?



 I just wanted to know..Actually i have a very loaded firewall(PF) with a
lot of states and i was wondering if this can help..
But if it is for sockets(something i have missed) then i will not help..


What can this variable help(mysql socket?)?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?18e02bd30605311335j4f0baaffs62002d4b72c7715b>