Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 14:20:51 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org> To: utisoft@gmail.com Cc: itetcu@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Matthias Andree <mandree@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: expiration of net/skype ?! Message-ID: <20110502142051.7d3284f5.itetcu@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinXJusac-Sc3LW2t=E2PyEL9cTSZg@mail.gmail.com> References: <BANLkTimQRFnDjY5g9tR%2B1VXDBQiXZ-EvxQ@mail.gmail.com> <4DBD0C24.4040305@FreeBSD.org> <BANLkTinffF79pdCFf7=LKSs7DYGXm=hh0A@mail.gmail.com> <4DBE7373.2020808@FreeBSD.org> <BANLkTinXJusac-Sc3LW2t=E2PyEL9cTSZg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 2 May 2011 12:14:37 +0100 Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2 May 2011 10:03, Matthias Andree <mandree@freebsd.org> wrote: > > Am 02.05.2011 10:49, schrieb Chris Rees: > > > >>> or otherwise issue a hint > >>> that the port is kept for the benefit of those who happen to have a > >>> distfile. > >> > >> Which is what, thirty people? > > > > I don't care. Let's not deliberately break the port for those who can > > still use it. > > > > Please remove the EXPIRATION_DATE; I'm also willing to "maintain" the > > port if needed. > > > > Although the port is already broken (no-one is deliberately breaking it), there > is a possible (temporary) solution for those who want to use their own distfile. > > ITetcu, miwi, please would you have a look at [1]? It's partly lifted > from the diablo > ports; just makes it more convenient if one has the distfile already, > as well as using > IGNORE rather than BROKEN; we know it won't ever build. > > Chris > > [1] http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/skype-distfile.diff Looks good; I was convinced something like this was already committed. -- Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110502142051.7d3284f5.itetcu>