Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 23:00:50 -0800 From: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> To: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> Cc: Bob K <melange@yip.org>, Patrick Greenwell <patrick@stealthgeeks.net>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Firewall config non-intuitiveness Message-ID: <3C53A5A2.A5F8FBD6@tenebras.com> References: <000c01c1a5ff$a4539870$0101a8c0@cascade> <20020125165307.C54729-100000@rockstar.stealthgeeks.net> <20020125203328.A454@yip.org> <15443.41177.259786.242696@caddis.yogotech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nate Williams wrote: > I'm guessing the number of firewall admins who have 'firewall_enable=NO' > in their configuration file is 0. Well... I start it in my setup script that enables the 802.11 interface, so I have it (and natd_enable) set to "NO" -- a peculiar case, the exception which proves you right, etc. I need both PCMCIA interfaces up before I start these, and the standard rc scripts don't provide a good way of doing this with more than one pccard interface (it's an old laptop that serves as my SMTP and DNS host, it has a built-in UPS aka a battery). The PCCARD stuff is somewhat non-deterministic and asynchronous in when the daemon actually gets the interfaces up, so... Yes, yes -- experienced professionals rarely go naked in say, Toronto, in January. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C53A5A2.A5F8FBD6>