Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 20 Oct 2012 13:52:17 +0200
From:      Ulrich =?utf-8?B?U3DDtnJsZWlu?= <uqs@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: RFC: removal of share/doc/{papers,psd,smm,usd} in 2 months
Message-ID:  <20121020115217.GI69724@acme.spoerlein.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgkwAVxnBEdsF1BVsE7xH1X%2B2-Fz-Vw0AKF8ORS5qfGLow@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20121019143617.GF69724@acme.spoerlein.net> <CAF6rxgkwAVxnBEdsF1BVsE7xH1X%2B2-Fz-Vw0AKF8ORS5qfGLow@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 12:14:28 -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 19 October 2012 10:36, Ulrich Spörlein <uqs@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > Should people feel strongly about them, we might be able to move them
> > over to the doc repository.
> 
> Moving them to the doc repo loses the history, for what gain?
> 
> You mention that the roff sources are 'naughty'. Are they holding up
> some project?

Replying to this only here: If you have a look at your calendar, you
might get the reference :)

They are holding up the removal of groff from the base system, which we
can no longer update thanks to the project policy wrt. GPLv3.

Uli



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121020115217.GI69724>