Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 13:08:47 +0200 From: Olivier Houchard <cognet@ci0.org> To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r251586 - head/sys/arm/ti Message-ID: <20130610110847.GA46614@ci0.org> In-Reply-To: <20130610035547.GX3047@kib.kiev.ua> References: <201306092251.r59MpCmW006162@svn.freebsd.org> <20130610035547.GX3047@kib.kiev.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 06:55:47AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 10:51:12PM +0000, Olivier Houchard wrote: > > Author: cognet > > Date: Sun Jun 9 22:51:11 2013 > > New Revision: 251586 > > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/251586 > > > > Log: > > Increase the maximum KVM available on TI chips. Not sure why we suddenly need > > that much, but that lets me boot with 1GB of RAM. > > I suspect that the cause is the combination of limited KVA and > lack of any limitation for the buffer map. I noted that ARM lacks > VM_BCACHE_SIZE_MAX after a report from mav about similar (?) problem a > day ago. > > In essence, the buffer map is allowed to take up to ~330MB when no > upper limit from VM_BCACHE_SIZE_MAX is specified. Hi Konstantin, Thanks for the hint ! It seems only i386 and sparc64 sets it, what would be a good value, 200M, as it is on i386 ? Regards, Olivier
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130610110847.GA46614>