Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 13:21:37 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> To: Ben Smithurst <ben@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu>, doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: sigmask(2) MLINK? against sigsetmask(2)/sigblock(2) manpages... Message-ID: <20010104132137.H86630@argon.firepipe.net> In-Reply-To: <20010104174731.J85794@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk>; from ben@FreeBSD.org on Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 05:47:31PM %2B0000 References: <20010104115943.F86630@argon.firepipe.net> <20010104174731.J85794@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 05:47:31PM +0000, Ben Smithurst wrote: > Do it, but they're the wrong way round. The source file comes first, > > MLINKS+= sigblock.2 sigmask.2 Oops. :-) > Fix it with ".Ft int" (but I'm sure you could have worked that out). Well, I'm trying to figure out why it should be in *BOTH* manpages. And then there's the question of which one it should be in. -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010104132137.H86630>