Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 7 Jul 2014 19:45:41 +1000
From:      John Marshall <john.marshall@riverwillow.com.au>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Should 9.3 carry a warning about NEW_XORG
Message-ID:  <20140707094541.GA1074@rwpc15.gfn.riverwillow.net.au>
In-Reply-To: <20140706220006.K50382@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
References:  <53B69B88.4060803@gmail.com> <E1X32XF-000PnU-QG@dilbert.ingresso.co.uk> <CAPyFy2BhARs%2BwxhOuP-09tcPgzerU00_ARy=o4OyKec9azTOkQ@mail.gmail.com> <20140705103235.GB7680@rwpc15.gfn.riverwillow.net.au> <alpine.BSF.2.11.1407050455010.5138@wonkity.com> <20140706220006.K50382@sola.nimnet.asn.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 06 Jul 2014, 23:47 +1000, Ian Smith wrote:
> John has a T43 thinkpad, with unstated graphics hardware; intel 915 or=20
> Radeon X300 according to thinkwiki?

For the record, Intel 915GM.  I included full details a few days ago in
my as-yet-unanswered post to -x11@.  Troubleshooting my X failure wasn't
the purpose of my post to -stable@; but it's sounding like the answer is
probably "pre-2009 hardware unsupported by the 9.3 default NEW_XORG".

> It seems that if you upgrade from 9.1 or 9.2 you will need to manually=20
> intervene, either way

In my case (short story for a user with older hardware):
 - leaving make.conf as is lands me in X trouble
 - adding WITHOUT_NEW_XORG to make.conf keeps things working as for 9.2

> Seeing that a perhaps not miniscule proportion of 9.x X users will need=
=20
> to do some manual configuration on upgrading to 9.3, a relevant WARNING=
=20
> in http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.3R/relnotes.html should be helpful.

Definitely.

Highlighting the fact that the 9.3 introduces a default NEW_XORG ports
build, pointing out implications for folks with "older" hardware and
the availability of the WITHOUT_NEW_XORG knob would, I think, be
helpful.  The ports infrastructure controls the logic for the NEW_XORG
build decision but I think the fact that the result of that decision for
9.3-RELEASE is OPPOSITE to what it is for 9.2-RELEASE, and that building
(now-default) NEW_XORG for folks with older hardware WILL break X for
them, warrants a note in the 9.3 release documentation.

--=20
John Marshall

--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEARECAAYFAlO6bEUACgkQw/tAaKKahKIjfwCgsEAs4jClVd9IdVwZIe11Kcaw
n5QAniOLuwDEF+Cz04pBF+EcViCZ1h3N
=KYOl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140707094541.GA1074>