Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 22:12:42 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> To: "Steve O'Hara-Smith" <steve@sohara.org> Cc: jonc@chen.org.nz, <craig@meoqu.gank.org>, <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Kernel config problem with 4.6-STABLE... [solution] Message-ID: <20020720220854.R49174-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <20020720185121.6d99ae98.steve@sohara.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 20 Jul 2002, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: SO> DM> make bootstrap SO> DM> make kernel KERNCONF=mykernel SO> DM> SO> DM> Opinions? SO> SO> Wouldn't it be more failsafe to make buildkernel depend on bootstrap ? Totally agreed. Now the most complicated part: we need to get Ruslan's "Yeah, it's the way we need" ;-) BTW, there is at least one pitfall, already mentioned: having installed src-base + src-sys is not enough to make buidlkernel (at least now). And I don't know both safe and efficient way to mix old way (config+make) with the new. Maybe Ruslan have some thoughts on it... Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020720220854.R49174-100000>