Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2022 23:09:36 +0200 From: Michael Gmelin <grembo@freebsd.org> To: Pete Wright <pete@nomadlogic.org> Cc: FreeBSD <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: nginx-full version numbering question Message-ID: <E811DC98-AB91-4C62-8B7C-AA6FF08E9175@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <6FB093FB-C867-4714-854A-7A03B021B83B@freebsd.org> References: <6FB093FB-C867-4714-854A-7A03B021B83B@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Apple-Mail-6B9116D2-B48A-4CE9-BA44-9F2216AE4588 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > On 28. Aug 2022, at 23:05, Michael Gmelin <grembo@freebsd.org> wrote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BF >=20 >=20 >>> On 28. Aug 2022, at 19:23, Pete Wright <pete@nomadlogic.org> wrote: >>>=20 >> =EF=BB=BF hey there - i had a question about an apparent version numberin= g issue with the nginx-full port: >> https://www.freshports.org/www/nginx-full/ >>=20 >> on April 10th the version number is: 1.20.2_9,2 >> then on the next update (may 31) the version number seems to go backwards= : 1.22.0_10,2 >>=20 >=20 > Hi Pete, >=20 > What makes you think that 1.22.0 is smaller than 1.20.2? >=20 This simply looks like a case where PORTREVISION wasn=E2=80=99t reset after a= PORTVERSION update - but this shouldn=E2=80=99t cause any harm, as long as p= ortrevision isn=E2=80=98t lowered within the same portversion. > Cheers >=20 >=20 >=20 >> i was curious if that was intended? this makes it a little awkward to up= grade a locally patched version of the port from before May 31, as i'll have= to uninstall then install to pick up the latest upstream (which contains a f= ix i was patching out of tree). >>=20 >> thanks! >> -pete >> --=20 >> Pete Wright >> pete@nomadlogic.org >> @nomadlogicLA --Apple-Mail-6B9116D2-B48A-4CE9-BA44-9F2216AE4588 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"content-type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3D= utf-8"></head><body dir=3D"auto"><div dir=3D"ltr"></div><div dir=3D"ltr"><br= ></div><div dir=3D"ltr"><br><blockquote type=3D"cite">On 28. Aug 2022, at 23= :05, Michael Gmelin <grembo@freebsd.org> wrote:<br><br></blockquote></= div><blockquote type=3D"cite"><div dir=3D"ltr">=EF=BB=BF<meta http-equiv=3D"= content-type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dutf-8"><div dir=3D"ltr"></div>= <div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><div dir=3D"ltr"><br><blockquote type=3D"cite">On= 28. Aug 2022, at 19:23, Pete Wright <pete@nomadlogic.org> wrote:<br><= br></blockquote></div><blockquote type=3D"cite"><div dir=3D"ltr">=EF=BB=BF =20 <meta http-equiv=3D"content-type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3DUTF-8"= > =20 =20 <font face=3D"monospace">hey there - i had a question about an apparent version numbering issue with the nginx-full port:<br> <a class=3D"moz-txt-link-freetext" href=3D"https://www.freshports.org/= www/nginx-full/">https://www.freshports.org/www/nginx-full/</a><br> <br> on April 10th the version number is:</font><font face=3D"monospace"><s= pan class=3D"element-details"> 1.20.2_9,2<br> then on the next update (may 31) the version number seems to go backwards: </span></font><font face=3D"monospace"><span class=3D"ele= ment-details"><span class=3D"element-details">1.22.0_10,2<br> <br></span></span></font></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Hi= Pete,</div><div><br></div><div>What makes you think that 1.22.0 is smaller t= han 1.20.2?</div><div><br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>This s= imply looks like a case where PORTREVISION wasn=E2=80=99t reset after a PORT= VERSION update - but this shouldn=E2=80=99t cause any harm, as long as portr= evision isn=E2=80=98t lowered within the same portversion.</div><br><blockqu= ote type=3D"cite"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div>Cheers</div><div><br></div><div><br>= </div><br><blockquote type=3D"cite"><div dir=3D"ltr"><font face=3D"monospace= "><span class=3D"element-details"><span class=3D"element-details"> i was curious if that was intended? this makes it a little awkward to upgrade a locally patched version of the port from before May 31, as i'll have to uninstall then install to pick up the latest upstream (which contains a fix i was patching out of tree).<br> <br> thanks!<br> -pete<br> </span></span></font> <pre class=3D"moz-signature" cols=3D"72">--=20 Pete Wright <a class=3D"moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href=3D"mailto:pete@nomadlogic.org">pe= te@nomadlogic.org</a> @nomadlogicLA</pre> =20 </div></blockquote></div></blockquote></body></html>= --Apple-Mail-6B9116D2-B48A-4CE9-BA44-9F2216AE4588--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E811DC98-AB91-4C62-8B7C-AA6FF08E9175>