Date: Mon, 18 May 1998 10:19:06 -0400 From: sbabkin@dcn.att.com To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, danj@3skel.com Subject: RE: system config database... Message-ID: <C50B6FBA632FD111AF0F0000C0AD71EEACDF3F@dcn71.dcn.att.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> ---------- > From: Dan Janowski[SMTP:danj@3skel.com] > > I do not want to get rid of any of the 'standard' > /etc files. This would seem to create additional > confusion for immigrants and the like. > Right! > I am thinking of a default config and a site config > (possibly multiple site configs, good for porto users). > The defaults will be used when site configs are > not specified. > > Should there be a /config, or a /etc/config? > (me, /config) > > Should I look at adding a statically linked > compiled program for boot time generation of > /etc files or strictly a shell? > (me, non-shell) > A pseudo-filesystem like /proc would seem to be the best solution for me. For prototype, I think there is no difference. -SB To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C50B6FBA632FD111AF0F0000C0AD71EEACDF3F>