Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 18 May 1998 10:19:06 -0400
From:      sbabkin@dcn.att.com
To:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, danj@3skel.com
Subject:   RE: system config database...
Message-ID:  <C50B6FBA632FD111AF0F0000C0AD71EEACDF3F@dcn71.dcn.att.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> ----------
> From: 	Dan Janowski[SMTP:danj@3skel.com]
> 
> I do not want to get rid of any of the 'standard'
> /etc files. This would seem to create additional
> confusion for immigrants and the like.
> 
Right!

> I am thinking of a default config and a site config
> (possibly multiple site configs, good for porto users).
> The defaults will be used when site configs are
> not specified.
> 
> Should there be a /config, or a /etc/config?
> (me, /config)
> 
> Should I look at adding a statically linked
> compiled program for boot time generation of
> /etc files or strictly a shell?
> (me, non-shell)
> 
A pseudo-filesystem like /proc would seem to be the best solution for
me.
For prototype, I think there is no difference.

-SB



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C50B6FBA632FD111AF0F0000C0AD71EEACDF3F>