Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 10 Jun 2015 17:22:16 -0400
From:      Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>, vbox@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: virtualbox kmod build fix after r284215
Message-ID:  <5578AA88.6040200@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150610194853.GF23380@dft-labs.eu>
References:  <20150610194853.GF23380@dft-labs.eu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 06/10/2015 15:48, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> the following is needed since r284215 (__FreeBSD_version 1100077):
> 
> --- ./src/VBox/Runtime/r0drv/freebsd/memobj-r0drv-freebsd.c.orig 
> 2015-06-10 19:30:28.355276494 +0000 +++ 
> ./src/VBox/Runtime/r0drv/freebsd/memobj-r0drv-freebsd.c	2015-06-10
>  19:30:41.280304985 +0000 @@ -747,7 +747,7 @@ { /** @todo: is this
>  needed?. */ PROC_LOCK(pProc); -        AddrR3 = 
> round_page((vm_offset_t)pProc->p_vmspace->vm_daddr + lim_max(pProc,
> RLIMIT_DATA)); +        AddrR3 = 
> round_page((vm_offset_t)pProc->p_vmspace->vm_daddr + 
> lim_max_proc(pProc, RLIMIT_DATA)); PROC_UNLOCK(pProc); } else

Committed (r389147), thanks!

> Interestingly enough for some reason the build does not fail 
> without the patch, even though resulting code is clearly broken as
>  lim_max now expects a thread argument.

Yes, kernel module build is very fragile ATM and it should be fixed.

Jung-uk Kim
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVeKqIAAoJEHyflib82/FG6RMH/i6o37JDe+CY/m3K9GOaL9LM
e6Rn65pMarZUeU3TvNchtqaK2SZF2gGo2b0CPnrRddE6Ufomm5molazoGcs9nSJX
MqCHs0bisg4zyo37JOHOWPQ5go/J6hfO1pPCGBhQ8E3j2BpyeRJykebnOwUQ9Tei
G7mTV78l0joEjkrxXt55TYuARtTuY8ISlyfzyXibghVm1meNvz0/CLcadgUkgn1a
H42XSsBpaJpSLrv8MW7+7rm8snc/Z3zWwd8vGHjRcUfQbyvPCMhMuLntMyW+t2yx
Eij4QYe+h2yfIXPW1M3h8amOCkMT8hJlQEfC9ZcroPjtIdanwv+6DuNWOfBLQMM=
=twB8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5578AA88.6040200>