Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 13:42:36 +0800 From: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: Csaba Henk <csaba-ml@creo.hu>, Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: switching threading libraries Message-ID: <200604081342.36295.davidxu@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20060407140809.GZ1323@beastie.creo.hu> References: <slrne3ck4t.18h.csaba@beastie.creo.hu> <Pine.GSO.4.43.0604070910310.15406-100000@sea.ntplx.net> <20060407140809.GZ1323@beastie.creo.hu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 07 April 2006 22:08, Csaba Henk wrote: > On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 09:10:56AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > Only between libthr and libpthread. libc_r doesn't have symbol > > versioning. > > That's sad -- given, as noted elsewhere, libc_r is the best suitable > for tracing. > > Will it remain like this or can we expect a symver'd libc_r > in due time? > > Regards, > Csaba libc_r does not have debugger can be used, libthr and libpthread do have. libthr can use ktrace to print thread ID, libthr can use top to observe a thread blocked on what event, I don't believe libc_r is best tracable. David Xu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200604081342.36295.davidxu>