Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 02:24:26 +0000 From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r236976 - head/sbin/fsck_ffs Message-ID: <59C39E5A-C63D-490C-B260-E00A4D90E213@lists.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <201206122137.q5CLbReK077123@svn.freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 12. Jun 2012, at 21:37 , Konstantin Belousov wrote: > Author: kib > Date: Tue Jun 12 21:37:27 2012 > New Revision: 236976 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/236976 > > Log: > For incompleted block allocations or frees, the inode block count usage > must be recalculated. The blk_check pass of suj checker explicitely marks > inodes which owned such blocks as needing block count adjustment. But > ino_adjblks() is only called by cg_trunc pass, which is performed before > blk_check. As result, the block use count for such inodes is left wrong. > This causes full fsck run after journaled run to still find inconsistencies > like 'INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=14557 (328 should be 0)' in phase 1. > > Fix this issue by running additional adj_blk pass after blk_check, which > updates the field. > > Reviewed by: jeff, mckusick Thanks a lot! /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions! It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do!home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?59C39E5A-C63D-490C-B260-E00A4D90E213>