Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 02:24:26 +0000 From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r236976 - head/sbin/fsck_ffs Message-ID: <59C39E5A-C63D-490C-B260-E00A4D90E213@lists.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <201206122137.q5CLbReK077123@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201206122137.q5CLbReK077123@svn.freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 12. Jun 2012, at 21:37 , Konstantin Belousov wrote: > Author: kib > Date: Tue Jun 12 21:37:27 2012 > New Revision: 236976 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/236976 > > Log: > For incompleted block allocations or frees, the inode block count usage > must be recalculated. The blk_check pass of suj checker explicitely marks > inodes which owned such blocks as needing block count adjustment. But > ino_adjblks() is only called by cg_trunc pass, which is performed before > blk_check. As result, the block use count for such inodes is left wrong. > This causes full fsck run after journaled run to still find inconsistencies > like 'INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=14557 (328 should be 0)' in phase 1. > > Fix this issue by running additional adj_blk pass after blk_check, which > updates the field. > > Reviewed by: jeff, mckusick Thanks a lot! /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions! It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do!help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?59C39E5A-C63D-490C-B260-E00A4D90E213>