Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 12:53:28 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc.d scripts can be missed if they aren't ordered with respect to the early-late divider Message-ID: <4DBB1738.6050702@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20110429124049.GB79653@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <BANLkTi=FH4DeB-bH9Dcre_U-5J%2BP%2B3o_BA@mail.gmail.com> <4DBB01D9.2060805@FreeBSD.org> <4DBB09FA.1040108@FreeBSD.org> <20110429124049.GB79653@lor.one-eyed-alien.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 04/29/2011 05:40, Brooks Davis wrote: > I'll admit I find ':' separators more unixy Me too (e.g., the previously mentioned code in rc.conf) but given that we have to take into account stuff from the ports, and it's also not impossible that someone would put Wacky::Perl::Script in /usr/local/etc/rc.d, I wanted to err on the side of caution. :) Thanks for the review, Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4DBB1738.6050702>