Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 05:14:53 -0800 From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com> To: "Mike Meyer" <mwm@mired.org> Cc: <advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG>, <chat@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: NatWest? no thanks Message-ID: <005201c166c5$06164dc0$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com> In-Reply-To: <15335.54859.676721.164993@guru.mired.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>-----Original Message----- >From: Mike Meyer [mailto:mwm@mired.org] >Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 4:24 AM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt >Cc: advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG; chat@FreeBSD.ORG >Subject: RE: NatWest? no thanks > > > >The thing is, if you design a web site for the WORLD wide web, and not >for the web balkanized by browser type, your site will be ADA >compliant. In other words, if the web site is properly designed to >interoperate with the hundreds - if not thousands - of different >agents that read web pages, ignoring the ADA completely, then the web >site will be ADA compliant. No special effort is needed. > Then how about instead of mandating ADA compliance, you mandate EITHER ADA compliance, or W3C compliance? I'd rather see ADA compliance mandate a website comply with a public standard than with it's own set of special rules. Ted Mittelstaedt tedm@toybox.placo.com Author of: The FreeBSD Corporate Networker's Guide Book website: http://www.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?005201c166c5$06164dc0$1401a8c0>