Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 19:20:00 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: Mario Goebbels <mariog@tomservo.cc>, <current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: About GEOM... Message-ID: <20020704191641.C21375-100000@gamplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <12909.1025704072@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <20020703233109.B17974-100000@gamplex.bde.org>, Bruce Evans writes: > >This is mostly because resources have been diverted away from updating > >working code to write a second system. > > Make that third system, the current slice/label code is our second > system, and I don't think the resources have been diverted as much > as defected. > > Either way, I know you don't want either of DEVFS or GEOM, I think > I know where you come from, I just happen to not agree that we > should stay stuck back there. I disagree that DEVFS and GEOM are forwards. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020704191641.C21375-100000>