Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 26 Apr 2005 11:34:53 -0400
From:      Anish Mistry <mistry.7@osu.edu>
To:        Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ule+preempt?
Message-ID:  <200504261135.07833.mistry.7@osu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <17006.19740.605509.984940@roam.psg.com>
References:  <17006.19740.605509.984940@roam.psg.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart2109958.LX0zOsa3TK
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Tuesday 26 April 2005 10:15 am, Randy Bush wrote:
> having been seriously burned, i have avoided ule for some months.
> i am wondering if the waters have become relatively safe to go
> to ule with preemption?
>
I've been running it for few weeks and it seems to be fine for now,=20
but YMMV.

=2D-=20
Anish Mistry

--nextPart2109958.LX0zOsa3TK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBCbl+rxqA5ziudZT0RApJUAJsHmedRiAGoXrUr8DB3lnH9h7s8rQCgs2hP
XEvnNyG+Dxyh7h8o3mE9Tak=
=Z0JR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2109958.LX0zOsa3TK--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200504261135.07833.mistry.7>