Date: Wed, 4 Mar 1998 22:45:40 -0500 From: dmaddox@scsn.net (Donald J. Maddox) To: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, dmaddox@scsn.net Cc: Evan Champion <evanc@synapse.net>, Matthew Thyer <Matthew.Thyer@dsto.defence.gov.au>, shimon@simon-shapiro.org, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: silo overflows (Was Re: 3.0-RELEASE?) Message-ID: <19980304224540.64292@scsn.net> In-Reply-To: <199803050332.TAA23822@dingo.cdrom.com>; from Mike Smith on Wed, Mar 04, 1998 at 07:32:25PM -0800 References: <19980304221012.62373@scsn.net> <199803050332.TAA23822@dingo.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 04, 1998 at 07:32:25PM -0800, Mike Smith wrote: <SNIP> > > > > Add this to your system conf: > > > > options "MSIZE=256" > > Interesting; why change the mbuf size? Is this a recommended change > for general operation, or is 128 bytes still preferred? > > > options "TTYHOG=4096" > > This increases tty-internal buffers, but wouldn't be expected to affect > interrupt latency. (There may be some carryover though.) > > - Were you seeing "silo overflow" messages? > - Have the above changes affected your actual throughput? Sorry, I didn't read the original message closely enough... I was actually getting interrupt-level buffer oflows, not silo oflows. This fix is for a different problem :-/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980304224540.64292>