Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 18:07:24 +0400 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Motoyuki Konno <motoyuki@bsdclub.org> Cc: Nik Clayton <nik@FreeBSD.ORG>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: doc/ tree frozen (was Re: HEADS UP for /usr/src/release/doc & /usr/doc) Message-ID: <20010611180723.A35967@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20010611175041.A35687@nagual.pp.ru>; from ache@nagual.pp.ru on Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 05:50:43PM %2B0400 References: <20010611035650.A20707@nagual.pp.ru> <20010611060725.A4531@nagual.pp.ru> <01061113044201.36820@clan.nothing-going-on.org> <20010611161221.C34164@nagual.pp.ru> <200106111337.f5BDbCE30451@sakura.mk.bsdclub.org> <20010611175041.A35687@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 17:50:43 +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 22:37:12 +0900, Motoyuki Konno wrote: > > > 1) Lengthy discussion already happens in -i18n > > > 2) Repo-copy was done by Peter. > > > > We discussed in -i18n ML, but you said NOTHING about doc/ tree. > > Renaming is a technical question not related to doc. Having both old and > new names mix leads to chaos. To explain more: it is namespace policy applied which not affects doc/ consistance in any way. As you may remember, there was doc/ja one time which was renamed to doc/ja_JP.eucJP and many similar renames happens here. I don't see you suppose that it can breaks -stable in that cases. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010611180723.A35967>