Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 09:18:48 +0200 From: Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org> To: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>, Alberto Mijares <amijaresp@gmail.com> Cc: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: Upgrading to DocBook 5.0 Message-ID: <51DD0AD8.60102@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgnL8JSSq8tfTu9mBKLA9qXdR_Mgvr-At0bYSM61kwFcxA@mail.gmail.com> References: <519FA4FE.4030305@FreeBSD.org> <51D3E051.5070506@FreeBSD.org> <CAGZBXN8dLmf6iuCpD4cw5zbOP-NLj%2BRqqxtndRa9rAvScSo3Ag@mail.gmail.com> <CAF6rxgnL8JSSq8tfTu9mBKLA9qXdR_Mgvr-At0bYSM61kwFcxA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Em 10-07-2013 00:10, Eitan Adler escreveu: > top posting, really? > > >> >On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 3:56 AM, Gabor Kovesdan<gabor@freebsd.org> >>> >>One more thing to discuss: shall we maintain the sect1, sect2, ... elements >>> >>or just use section? > How would this be rendered in HTML? Does this change anything? As already mentioned: no. Not reading history, really? ;) Gabor
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51DD0AD8.60102>