Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 08:24:14 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Andrew Thompson <thompsa@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MFC rstp Message-ID: <20070118082139.W82671@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <20070118035748.GE12548@heff.fud.org.nz> References: <20070118035748.GE12548@heff.fud.org.nz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, Andrew Thompson wrote: Hi, > I have a patch here to MFC the rstp code to RELENG_6. It should be all > fine and dandy as for API but will cause the default spanning tree > version to change from stp to rstp. > > Is it ok to change the protocol version for the STABLE users (rstp is > backwards compatable with stp) or should it still default to stp and > require the OP to enable rstp. > > Any opinions? I think you should leave stp as default and have the user configure rstp if (s)he thinks (s)he needs it. -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070118082139.W82671>