Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:03:15 +0200 From: Nikos Ntarmos <ntarmos@ceid.upatras.gr> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gprof's broken in 7-CURRENT Message-ID: <20071129080315.GC99338@ace.netcins.ceid.upatras.gr> In-Reply-To: <474E0838.2050806@u.washington.edu> References: <200711252154.lAPLsMXb003966@luoqi.homeunix.org> <fik1so$fr3$2@ger.gmane.org> <20071128232728.GA99338@ace.netcins.ceid.upatras.gr> <474E0838.2050806@u.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 04:30:48PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: > And to think that I mentioned this problem 5-6 months ago with gcc > 4.2.x and now it finally gets publicity... > > Then again I wasn't aware of the register issue details with gprof. IIRC that was with gcc 4.2.0 and before the code freeze and RELENG_7 branching. I had hoped that it would get fixed when 4.2.1 would be merged (along with some other "well-known" plagues of 4.2.0) but eventually it didn't... :) I just hope that luoqi@ (or somebody else) will tackle this thing soon enough for 7.0R (or at least for 7.1R). BTW 7.0 is shaping up pretty well. Kudos to all hackers and thank you for another great (soon-to-be) release! \n\n -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Nikos Ntarmos <ntarmos@ceid.upatras.gr> iD8DBQFHTnJDm6J1ac+VFgoRAkKlAJ9+8oj3DpK0M9+W/HQ1TGvC2pqjhwCeM+nb sDsZQp2SzThOjxNGVKY+FZw= =w69r -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071129080315.GC99338>