Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:19:37 +0100 From: Thomas Backman <serenity@exscape.org> To: O. Hartmann <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Phoronix Benchmarks: Waht's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0? Message-ID: <0D3A9408-84A8-4C74-A318-F580B41FC1A6@exscape.org> In-Reply-To: <4B13869D.1080907@zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <4B13869D.1080907@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 30, 2009, at 9:47 AM, O. Hartmann wrote: > I'm just wondering what's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0/amd64 when I read the = Benchmarks on Phoronix.org's website. Especially FreeBSD's threaded I/O = shows in contrast to all claims that have been to be improoved the = opposite. Corrected link: = http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=3Darticle&item=3Dfreebsd8_benchmarks= &num=3D1 And yeah, quite honestly: disk scheduling in FreeBSD appears to suck... = The only reason I'm not switching from Linux. :( Regards, Thomas (PS. See my thread about horrible console latency during disk IO in the = archives, very related. DS.)=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0D3A9408-84A8-4C74-A318-F580B41FC1A6>