Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 02:49:23 +0100 From: Alex de Kruijff <freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCO Lawsuits, round 2 Message-ID: <20031123014923.GD532@dds.nl> In-Reply-To: <3FBCBE7D.DA14199@mindspring.com> References: <23740.216.195.235.103.1069277586.squirrel@webmail.gigguardian.com> <3FBCBE7D.DA14199@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 05:15:41AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: > "Marc G. Fournier" wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Ceri Davies wrote: > > > "I agree that the more yarn you pull out the more you see," McBride said > > > during a press briefing at the inaugural Enterprise IT Week at cdXpo > > > Conference here. "We have enough sorted out, but we are so focused on > > > the [IBM litigation]. With our limited energies and what our guys are > > > going through, we probably won't file any suits against BSD until > > > sometime in the first half of next year." > > > > Um ... who is BSD? *scratch head* Or do they intend to sue Berkeley > > themselves? > > Clearly, if they are referring to the settlement, they would > have to go after the people with whom they settled, or their > assigns. That would be BSDI (now Wind River Systems) and the I would like to add that BSDI convinced the judge that AT&T had to go to Berkley since they had released the code. They where happy to talk about the six files they added. The settlement is betwain Bekley and SCO. As Greg wrote, the settlement include a clause that stated that they wouldn't sue. If SCO sues any of the BSD based system then there in violation. -- Alex Articles based on solutions that I use: http://www.kruijff.org/alex/index.php?dir=docs/FreeBSD/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031123014923.GD532>