Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 14:10:44 +0000 From: David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> Cc: toolchain@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Removing default build of gcc Message-ID: <44ED3C73-4BC0-4EFE-9072-474E6FE32B71@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <510290A1.5010809@FreeBSD.org> References: <74D8E686-3679-46F2-8A08-4CF5DFC020CA@FreeBSD.org> <20130125113122.GN2522@kib.kiev.ua> <1B345827-76F0-49C7-8D54-82866938E0A1@theravensnest.org> <510290A1.5010809@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 25 Jan 2013, at 14:03, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 25/01/2013 15:21 David Chisnall said the following: >> This is something that has been said on mailing lists, at BSDCan and at >> DevSummits in the past, without any objections being raised. > > A simple test - has there been a core decision that no GPL software must be > shipped with 10.x? There can be no such decision until it's all of the bits of GPL'd code in base have replacements in and testing has happened. That is why it is a plan, not an accomplished goal. This is why we have the wiki page tracking the progress of replacements: https://wiki.freebsd.org/GPLinBase Davidhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44ED3C73-4BC0-4EFE-9072-474E6FE32B71>