Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 08:31:49 -0500 From: dmaddox@scsn.net (Donald J. Maddox) To: Andrew Gordon <arg@arg1.demon.co.uk>, Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The BSD License Message-ID: <19980130083149.48975@scsn.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.980130112910.552A-100000@server.arg.sj.co.uk>; from Andrew Gordon on Fri, Jan 30, 1998 at 12:06:49PM %2B0000 References: <199801300203.CAA26796@awfulhak.org> <Pine.BSF.3.91.980130112910.552A-100000@server.arg.sj.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jan 30, 1998 at 12:06:49PM +0000, Andrew Gordon wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Jan 1998, Brian Somers wrote: > > I'm not sure that this is the correct question either. > > > > The rfc seems to indicate to me that they are not willing to give > > their software away without at least an NDA. That in itself is not a > > problem if they're willing to tell us (or me) how to implement the > > algorithm (and don't place any restrictions on that knowledge). If > > they were willing to do this, I would have thought it would already > > be explained in the rfc. Unfortunately it isn't. > > Are you sure? The RFC implies that the information it contains, plus the > information in ANSI X3.241-1994 is a complete definition of the protocol. This seems to be right... Anybody have access to ANSI X3.241-1994?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980130083149.48975>