Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 18:28:40 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 251412] [patch] math/py-pandas Update to 1.1.4 (Python 3.9 compatible) Message-ID: <bug-251412-21822-GsnKBWOY0Y@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-251412-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-251412-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251412 j.david.lists@gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #220024|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #4 from j.david.lists@gmail.com --- Created attachment 220077 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=220077&action=edit Same patch, but restore PORTEPOCH Here is the patch with PORTEPOCH restored. I only use poudriere so I don't know how to do "make makepatch" in that context. This patch seems to apply and work, but feel free to modify it as needed. With respect to math/py-statsmodels and devel/py-xarray, I am a sysadmin not a Python programmer so I know very little about it. But I have encountered that the Python numeric stuff can be incredibly tricky to build and combine, and not everything works in every combination. If that stuff isn't commonly used, blanket adding it to RUN_DEPENDS may have serious unanticipated consequences. It's not something I feel I know enough about to mess with. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-251412-21822-GsnKBWOY0Y>