Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 00:19:59 -0400 From: Scott Lambert <lambert@lambertfam.org> To: FreeBSD-STABLE@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: What do you think about STABLE? Message-ID: <20020810041959.GA73096@laptop.lambertfam.org> In-Reply-To: <20020810035015.17253.qmail@ns1.onie.yi.org> References: <200208100321.aa32703@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> <20020810035015.17253.qmail@ns1.onie.yi.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 10:50:15PM -0500, Ronneil Camara wrote: > I've been seeing a lot of post which doesn't sound good about STABLE. 3 > Days ago, I cvsup and make buildworld and installed new kernel without any > problem. Today, there is another machine that I want to upgrade from > 4.5-STABLE to 4.6-STABLE. What do you think about cvsup'ing today and > making the world? Are there still any problems? Should I just wait for a > couple of days? Actually, the reason why I wanted to upgrade to 4.6-STABLE > is because the perl that comes with my 4.5-STABLE is only version 5.005_03. > And when I try to compile mod-perl, it says something "undefined" then goes > back to the prompt. Perl is the same in 4.6. Install the port if you want something newer. You should probably cvsup to the RELENG_4_6 branch which doesn't change except for security issues. The "security" branches are the only ones guaranteed to work all the time. > If there is an easier way of upgrading my perl, then I won't have to make > buildworld and the other stuff. And my other concern is that the freebsd is > a remote machine. So if it got hosed, then I am f-up. :) Use the port. But you should update FreeBSD at least to RELENG_4_5. -- Scott Lambert KC5MLE Unix SysAdmin lambert@lambertfam.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020810041959.GA73096>