Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 26 May 2016 12:48:22 +0200
From:      Fabian Keil <freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de>
To:        FreeBSD Filesystems <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: zfs receive stalls whole system
Message-ID:  <20160526124822.374b2dea@fabiankeil.de>
In-Reply-To: <20160517123627.699e2aa5@fabiankeil.de>
References:  <0C2233A9-C64A-4773-ABA5-C0BCA0D037F0@ultra-secure.de> <20160517102757.135c1468@fabiankeil.de> <c090ab7bbff2fffe2a49284f9be70183@ultra-secure.de> <20160517123627.699e2aa5@fabiankeil.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]
Fabian Keil <freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de> wrote:

> rainer@ultra-secure.de wrote:
> 
> > Am 2016-05-17 10:27, schrieb Fabian Keil:  
> > > Rainer Duffner <rainer@ultra-secure.de> wrote:
> > >     
> > >> I have two servers, that were running FreeBSD 10.1-AMD64 for a long 
> > >> time, one zfs-sending to the other (via zxfer). Both are NFS-servers 
> > >> and MySQL-slaves, the sender is actively used as NFS-server, the 
> > >> recipient is just a warm-standby, in case something serious happens 
> > >> and we don’t want to wait for a day until the restore is back in 
> > >> place. The MySQL-Slaves are actively used as read-only servers (at the 
> > >> application level, Python’s SQL-Alchemy does that, apparently).
> > >> 
> > >> They are HP DL380G8 (one CPU, hexacore) with over 128 GB RAM (I think 
> > >> one has 144, the other has 192).
> > >> While they were running 10.1, they used HP P420 RAID-controllers with 
> > >> individual 12 RAID0 volumes that I pooled into 6-disk RAIDZ2 vdevs.
> > >> I use zfsnap to do hourly, daily and weekly snapshots.    
> > > [...]    
> > >> Now, when I do a zxfer, sometimes the whole system stalls while the 
> > >> data is sent over, especially if the delta is large or if something 
> > >> else is reading from the disk at the same time (backup agent).
> > >> 
> > >> I had this before, on 10.0 (I believe, we didn’t have this in 9.1 
> > >> either, IIRC) and it went away in 10.1.    
> > > 
> > > Do you use geli for swap device(s)?    
> > 
> > 
> > Yes, I do.
> > /dev/mirror/swap.eli		none	swap	sw		0	0
> > 
> > Bad idea?  
> 
> It can cause deadlocks and poor performance when paging.
> 
> This was recently fixed in ElectroBSD and I intend to submit
> the patch in a couple of days after a bit more stress testing.

Done: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209759

Fabian

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEARECAAYFAldG1HcACgkQBYqIVf93VJ0TDgCeKKfOKu3Say8K0QDsWuAPmhPA
s3AAoJPlCDWMXyVZJOBsOQulUU94U+hS
=f3f2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160526124822.374b2dea>