Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 21:38:10 +0000 From: "emaste (Ed Maste)" <phabric-noreply@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] [Commented On] D2378: Introduce ITS support for ARM64 Message-ID: <bf596d257ada8a491374095dce0625bb@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-xmqmcfafyun443233vly-req@FreeBSD.org> References: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-xmqmcfafyun443233vly-req@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
emaste added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS sys/arm64/arm64/gic_v3.c:297 Is something like GIC_LAST_LPI sensible? Or any interrupt number >= 8192 is LPI? REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2378 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: zbb, imp, ian, andrew, emaste, manpages Cc: eadler, jmg, gnn, kib, emaste, andrew, freebsd-arm-list, imp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bf596d257ada8a491374095dce0625bb>