Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 03:57:46 -0500 From: Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: the jem report bashes fbsd-6.0 Message-ID: <43D9E08A.5000307@rogers.com> In-Reply-To: <20060127084427.GA35556@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060127012902.61e974dd.kgunders@teamcool.net> <20060127084427.GA35556@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 01:29:02AM -0700, Ken Gunderson wrote: > >> An older article I just happened across: >> >> <http://www.thejemreport.com/mambo/content/view/194/45/>; >> >> Personally think he's far off the mark, e.g. >> >> "The AMD64 edition didn't work well on two systems. Since it has a long >> and inglorious history of severe stability problems that appear to have >> carried over into 6.0, I would strongly recommend using the i386 >> edition of FreeBSD instead of the AMD64 edition." >> >> Definitely not congruous with my experiences but then my amd64 systems >> are far from stressed:-) But thought I'd post the link in case someone >> wanted to address in more detail. >> > > You're right that it's old news, but the consensus seemed to be that > he's posting from some kind of weird parallel universe where things > work Differently :-) > > Kris > Write him back, and tell him he's a tool :P
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43D9E08A.5000307>