Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 09:25:54 -0400 From: Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: List replies] Message-ID: <20080323092554.467fb823.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20080322112356.2de9abf0@scorpio> References: <1206160415.6973.44.camel@laptop2.herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20080322083028.777a84a8.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20080322112356.2de9abf0@scorpio>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Gerard <gerard@seibercom.net> wrote: > > On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 08:30:28 -0400 > Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> wrote: > > > Da Rock <rock_on_the_web@comcen.com.au> wrote: > > > > > > Fair enough, but is it necessary on all the lists for freebsd? > > > > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > > That is one man's point of view. There are several others though. a) What was your point in saying that? b) Not really. It's a list of reasons and the reasons are factual, not opinion. While the overall conclusion is opinion, the article is factual and informative in nature. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080323092554.467fb823.wmoran>