Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 11:06:24 +1030 (CST) From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@picnic.mat.net> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@altavista.net>, bwoods2@uswest.net, Joel Ray Holveck <joelh@gnu.org>, Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com>, Alex Zepeda <jazepeda@pacbell.net> Subject: Re: kdelibs port broken? Message-ID: <XFMail.000228110624.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0002271826120.301-100000@picnic.mat.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 27-Feb-00 Chuck Robey wrote: > Some stuff, like tclsh, could have a default link, say from tclsh to > tclsh8.2, or allow a user to set that. That could be a local option, but > it's icing on the cake as far as I'm concerned. The only real thing I > would be after is the ability to stick the config file locations in the > places that the original developers (and the configuration scripts they > build with) expect them to be. Anything done as far as executeable names, > I don't really care too much about. There are only a few libraries that have a config file to aid compiling/linking. Of the ones we 'version' (GTK and GLIB) you can set the GLIB/GTK_CONFIG env. var to tell apps where to find it. I don't think its possible for tcl since it looks in a given path for a config file instead of looking for a config file in the path. --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.000228110624.doconnor>