Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 20:26:22 +0000 (GMT) From: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> To: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> Cc: alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pcb_onfault bug on alpha? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0002242025480.8714-100000@salmon.nlsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <200002241658.IAA39924@vashon.polstra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, John Polstra wrote: > On a related topic, do you have any idea why they did all this > ".set noat" nonsense in copyout instead of simply using t0 to set > pcb_onfault as is done elsewhere? I can't see any reason why they'd > need to preserve t0 at this point. I can't think of a reason. Changing to use t0 would be the same number of instructions but the code would be neater... -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 181 442 9037 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0002242025480.8714-100000>