Date: Wed, 4 Mar 1998 22:44:40 -0500 (EST) From: "John S. Dyson" <dyson@FreeBSD.ORG> To: mike@smith.net.au (Mike Smith) Cc: dmaddox@scsn.net, evanc@synapse.net, Matthew.Thyer@dsto.defence.gov.au, mike@smith.net.au, shimon@simon-shapiro.org, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: silo overflows (Was Re: 3.0-RELEASE?) Message-ID: <199803050344.WAA00470@dyson.iquest.net> In-Reply-To: <199803050332.TAA23822@dingo.cdrom.com> from Mike Smith at "Mar 4, 98 07:32:25 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Smith said: > > Interesting; why change the mbuf size? Is this a recommended change > for general operation, or is 128 bytes still preferred? > The MSIZE isn't needed. > > > options "TTYHOG=4096" > > This increases tty-internal buffers, but wouldn't be expected to affect > interrupt latency. (There may be some carryover though.) > > - Were you seeing "silo overflow" messages? > - Have the above changes affected your actual throughput? > Note that i also changed the thresholds in the sio.c file. -- John | Never try to teach a pig to sing, dyson@freebsd.org | it just makes you look stupid, jdyson@nc.com | and it irritates the pig. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199803050344.WAA00470>